Two early-career researchers have shared their reflections after being nominated to attend the 2025 NIHR Doctoral Training Camp in Hinckley, describing the experience as “incredibly insightful” and “transformational” in their approach to securing research funding.

Leonard, who was nominated by Professor Yemisi, expressed deep appreciation for the opportunity:

“Thank you once again for nominating me for the NIHR Doctoral Training Programme. I truly appreciate the opportunity you provided,” he said.

For Leonard, one of the most valuable lessons was the emphasis on patient and public involvement (PPI) in project design.

“I gained significant understanding on the importance of involving PPI experts or individuals with lived experience in designing projects that have both focused and broad impact,” he noted.
He added that the training also underscored the importance of assembling the right team when applying for grants — a principle he intends to adopt as he actively seeks new funding calls in the coming months.
“I feel much better equipped to approach them now… This opportunity has greatly enhanced my understanding of the funding landscape and project development.”

Tosin Orababa, who attended the camp after being nominated by REDiC, described the three-day event as both challenging and rewarding.

“When I was nominated… I was excited, as it presented a great opportunity to learn firsthand from grant reviewers about what makes a successful grant stand out,” he explained.

Tosin highlighted the diverse and collaborative nature of the camp. Participants were divided into groups tasked with developing a full grant proposal within 24 hours, guided by academic mentors and PPI contributors.

“The exciting thing about the groups was that they consisted of people from diverse areas of research and specialities. This meant that everyone brought a unique perspective to the conversation,” he said.

The intensity of the process was a defining feature.

“Day 2 was interesting, intense, and chaotic as we had a short time (less than 12 hours) to complete the grant application, finances, presentation slides, and get them signed off by the funding call director,” Tosin recalled.
Support from mentors such as Professor Justin Durham and PPI personnel Peter Hart helped guide teams through the pressure.

Although Tosin’s group did not win the presentation prize, he said the experience left him better prepared for future funding applications.

“I particularly feel more confident developing a grant/fellowship proposal than I felt before the camp, and I have learnt more about what PPI entails and how to incorporate it into one’s proposal,” he reflected.
“I would like to thank REDiC for nominating me to attend this bootcamp, as well as NIHR, for this great learning experience.”

Both Leonard and Tosin agreed that the camp has equipped them with new tools, perspectives, and confidence to pursue future funding opportunities, while reinforcing the crucial role of patient and public involvement in impactful research.